Francis Payne
(2014) Barrister
View my expertise Download my profile Get in touch
Francis is a specialist family practitioner, with a particular focus in private law children and matrimonial finance matters. He is regularly instructed in legally complex, factually and/or lengthy hearings involving children disputes, matrimonial finance as well as Domestic violence . Francis is a courageous advocate who strives to secure the best possible results for his clients. Commended for his “valiant submissions” (HHJ) in Court, Francis often demonstrates advocacy skills beyond his year of call. Francis’s friendly, sensitive and down to earth approach coupled with his background makes him an instant hit with clients, who are reassured by his ability to provide comprehensive legal advice in a straightforward digestible form.
Public access accredited, Francis is able to take instructions directly from members of the public.
Francis has also been appointed to the Government Legal Department’s Junior Panel of Counsel and takes suitable instructions from the government.
More about Francis Payne
For more information or to get in touch with Francis please contact the clerks room who will be happy to assist you.
Francis is regularly instructed in Children Act 1989 matters and regularly represents parents and other family members at all stages of private children law disputes, from first hearing to final hearing , Often appearing in multi-day contested hearings where complex and serious facts are in dispute, and where rigorous challenge to the evidence is required . He has vast experience representing clients in factual as well as welfare disputes, and he has a wealth of expertise in dealing with allegations of serious domestic abuse (including sexual abuse), non-accidental injuries and child abuse, drug misuse, parental alienation, applications for removal from jurisdiction/relocation within jurisdiction and human rights issues. Francis often appears in cases where a Guardian has been appointed for the children.
Francis has successfully represented parents seeking to obtain and resist child arrangements orders, determine parental responsibility, and in applications for prohibited steps orders. Francis represents each client with care and skill. Outside of court, Francis is a confident negotiator and is often able to settle child arrangements (including interim arrangements) in favourable terms for his clients. Despite his youthful looks, Francis is a parent and is able to emphasise with his clients and ensure that their case is skilfully presented in court.
Francis’ results and testimonials are a clear indicator of his ability in this area.
Francis has represented many clients in cases involving Domestic Abuse, dealing with applications for injunctions under the Family Law Act 1996 (non-molestation orders and occupation orders) both on an without notice and on-notice basis through to final hearing including where those applications are linked to Children Act 1989 proceedings . Francis successfully represents both parties raising and defending serious allegations of domestic abuse including violence, sexual abuse and abuse of minors.
Francis’ background enables him to prepare cases diligently, pinpointing crucial evidence in order to succeed in a case.
Francis appears in and advises upon financial remedy proceedings from first appointment to contested final hearing. Francis has extensive experience in matrimonial proceedings and is often instructed in cases involving,high net worth, trusts, businesses, third party interests and hidden assets .Francis is a fierce and confident advocate who uses his skill and expertise to obtain favourable outcomes for his clients. In cases where there are limited assets, Francis will look to achieve acceptable and sustainable solutions, saving his clients significant costs. Francis is able to assist on applications for financial provision under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 and financial disputes between cohabitees .
As a result of Francis’ time spent with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (working within the MTIC Fraud and Strategic Litigation teams), he has a solid grasp of taxation (in particular direct and indirect tax matters and issues relating to the Finance Act 2014) and insolvency issues and has a keen eye for contrived financial activity and the dissipation of assets.
Francis is available to represent clients in arbitration and at private FDRs. Francis also sits as a private FDR Judge.
With his wealth of experience in matrimonial finance matters, Francis is available to represent clients in arbitration and at private FDRs. Francis also sits as a private FDR judge.
Francis often gives seminars and lectures to solicitors on prevalent issues.
Outside chambers, Francis’ main interests are football (watching his team Leyton Orient lose every weekend), boxing and spending time with his young family. Prior to attending University, Francis was a competitive boxer and competed at County and District Level. Francis received a Sporting Excellence Scholarship from the University of Portsmouth as a result of his achievements within the sport.
Francis is passionate about the provision of legal services to all who require it. His dedication is such that he is the Co-Founder of a Legal Advice Clinic for a London charity, Shelter from the Storm. Coming from a ‘non-traditional’ background and keen to promote diversity at the Independent Bar, Francis regularly gives talks to Secondary School and University students about entry into the legal profession.
Francis Payne, a barrister at No.18 Chambers, is known for his work in private children disputes and financial remedy cases, often involving complex and sensitive issues. With a background in criminal law and experience at HMRC, he brings a strong analytical approach to cases involving financial complexity. His advocacy is marked by clarity and precision, and he is frequently instructed in matters requiring careful handling and strategic insight:
Representing M in CA proceedings. F was seeking a transfer of residency alleging alienating behaviours. M alleging F was emotionally abusive. Live with order made in favour of M with child having only supervised contact with F. The court found that F was emotionally abusive to M. Costs awarded against F on basis of his unreasonable litigation conduct.
Representing M in CA proceedings concerning child (17) with complex mental health difficulties. Final order made on an ‘exceptional basis’ for no contact between child and Father, an extension of previous s91(14) order and non-molestation order. Prohibited steps orders also made in favour of M. Costs awarded against F on basis of his unreasonable litigation conduct.
Represented W in matrimonial finance proceedings worth £25million.
Represented F at 2-day final hearing in circumstances where the younger children were having limited contact with F because of M’s behaviour. Secured a finding of parental alienation against M and a ‘joint lives with’ order was granted with F obtaining a 40/60 split of time with his children.
Represented W in matrimonial finance proceedings. Secured a 14-year Mesher and departure from equality in favour of W.
Represented W at a final hearing in matrimonial finance proceedings. In circumstances where H had failed to comply with court orders, Francis secured transfer of FMH to W and a costs award against H.
Represented F in 4-day fact finding where cross-allegations made. M was relying on significant allegations (including sexual abuse on non-subject child) to prevent contact between F and his daughter. F had 18 months without contact with his daughter by the time of the fact-finding hearing. Save for limited admissions made by F, all of M’s allegations were disproven. M found to have lied/exaggerated her evidence in order to frustrate contact between F and child. Contact reinstated immediately.
Representing Wife. One limited asset case. FDR indication was for a 50/50 split of the net proceeds. Francis secured 67.5% for his client at final hearing.
Representing Wife. Secured 77.5% of the net proceeds from the FMH and costs awarded against the Husband at final hearing.
Represented a client in matrimonial finance proceedings worth an estimated £2.5million. This case involved numerous international properties and issues relating to legal and beneficial ownership. Francis strategic advice on evidence following the FDA secured a concession from the other side as to his client’s beneficial ownership of a Spanish property worth 1,000,000 euros.
Advising and representing client in relation to making a worldwide freezing order in relation to assets worth approx. £2,000,000.
Represented M in 6-day fact finding hearing in relation to CA proceedings involving 7 children where F had made malicious allegations of child abuse in response to M’s allegations of domestic abuse. All of M’s 9 allegations proven. None of F’s allegations proven. No order for contact between F and children.
Represented F at a 3-day fact finding hearing. F had gone without contact with his son for 18 months due to M’s significant allegations (9) of child abuse and domestic abuse. None of Ms allegations proven at the fact-finding hearing. F now having contact with child.
Represented F in a ‘finely balanced case’ where F had repeatedly failed to comply with indirect contact which was a prerequisite to direct contact with his child. Child had complex additional needs. Direct contact ordered between F and child.
Represented M at a 3-day fact finding hearing in relation to 22 separate allegations of domestic abuse including rape, physical, emotional, and psychological harm, controlling and coercive behaviour and child abuse. F denied all allegations (save for one) prior to the commencement of the fact-finding hearing. 21 allegations proven. F’s application for CAO subsequently dismissed.
Represented F in 3-day fact finding where cross allegations made. M was relying on significant allegations to prevent any contact between F and his daughter.. F had gone without contact with his daughter for over a year leading up to fact-finding hearing. Serous findings made against M and limited findings made against F. Contact reinstated immediately following fact-finding hearing.
Represented F in 3-day fact finding hearing where cross allegations made. Despite repeated allegations to social services by all children of physical harm by F, the court found that M had physically abused one of the children and influenced the children’s views against F. No findings of physical abuse by F.
Contempt proceedings where Francis represented the Respondent. Despite overwhelming evidence against his client (HHJ indicating that only a custodial sentence would suffice), Francis was able to have the proceedings dismissed with his client accepting one minor breach. No sanctions imposed.
Despite W’s repeated non-compliance with court orders (previous costs order made against W at first hearing), Francis was able to secure W substantially more spousal maintenance than was being offered (an additional 2 years amounting to £30,000), the lions share of the FMH and no adverse costs order against W.
Aadvising H in matter involving assets of £4,000,000. The case involves issues of earning capacity, the treatment of post-separation inheritance (including valuable artwork held on trust) and business assets. W’s Counsel leading junior who has appeared in the Supreme Court.
No.18 is delighted to announce that Francis Payne has taken an honorary appointment as a Barrister-in-Residence the University of Portsmouth. Francis was called to the Bar in 2014, and practises in...
No.18 Chambers is delighted to announce that Francis Payne (2014) has re-joined Chambers and will be available for work from the 26th September 2022. Francis is a courageous advocate who strives...
This case is an important reminder of the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Re H-N, Re T, Re H and Re B-B [2021] EWCA Civ 448 in relation...
This recent decision of the High Court deals with whether permission should be granted to publish a substantive judgment in financial proceedings when an interim reporting restriction (RRO) had previously...
In a decision released on 1 April 2020, the Supreme Court in WM Morrisons Supermarkets PLC v Various Claimants [2020] EWCA Civ 2339 has provided much needed clarity on the...
Friday 25th of April 2025
Our Family Finance Seminar is aimed at those currently practicing all aspects of Family Finance and those who are otherwise interested. We are planning on an informative and relaxed seminar...
Friday 20th of September 2024
Our Family Law Practitioners Training Seminar will provide valuable training to all support staff, paralegals/trainees and those newly qualifi ed who are currently practicing in aspects of Family Law surrounding...
Friday 12th of July 2024
Family Law Practitioners Training Seminar will provide valuable training to all support staff, paralegals/trainees and those newly qualifi ed who are currently practicing in all aspects of Family Law, whether...
Friday 21st of April 2023
Our Private Law Children & Matrimonial Finance Seminar 2023 is aimed at thosecurrently practicing all aspects of Private Law Children & Matrimonial Finance and thosewho are otherwise interested. We are...
Friday 18th of September 2020
Our Civil Conference 2020 will cover a diverse range of subjects and is aimed at all those practising and otherwise interested in civil, chancery or property law. We are planning an...
Thursday 9th of May 2019
No.18 are delighted to announce that Barnaby Large (2007) Francis Payne & John Franklin (2016) are speaking at The Hampshire Law Society Civil Litigation Seminar on the 9th May 2017. Barnaby...
Learn More About Public Law Children: Care Proceedings and Adoption
Learn More About Private Law Children: Residence and Contact
